Derby and Derbyshire Safeguarding Children Partnership Logo

Derby and Derbyshire Safeguarding Children Partnership Procedures Manual

Managing Individuals who Pose a Risk of Harm to Children


This chapter outlines the key points in relation managing individuals who pose a risk of harm to children.


Making a Referral to Social Care Procedure

Children who Present a Risk of Harm to Others Procedure


This guidance was reviewed and updated in July 2018, following publication of revised national MAPPA guidance.


  1. Introduction
  2. Collaborative Working
  3. Recognition and Assessment of Individuals who may Pose a Risk to Children
  4. Risk Assessment
  5. Referral to Children's Social Care
  6. An Individual who Admits Past Abuse of a Child
  7. A Child who Presents a Risk of Harm to Others
  8. Disclosure of Information
  9. Multi Agency Public Protection Arrangements (MAPPA)
  10. Multi Agency Risk Assessment Conferences (MARAC)
  11. Safe Employment and Recruitment
  12. Other Processes and Mechanisms
  13. Appendix A: Major Offences to Identify those who Present a Risk, or Potential Risk to Children

1. Introduction

This chapter provides practice guidance and information about a range of mechanisms that are available when managing people who have been identified as presenting a risk of harm to children.

2. Collaborative Working

The Children Act 1989 recognised that the identification and investigation of child abuse together with the protection and support of victims and their families requires multi-agency collaboration. This has rightly focused on the child and the supporting parent/carer. As part of that protection, action can be taken to prosecute known offenders or control their access to children. This also applies to the on-going risk of harm that an individual perpetrator may present to other children in the future.

3. Recognition and Assessment of Individuals who may Pose a Risk to Children

Indicators of individuals who may pose a risk to children include:

Regardless of any information from an individual's background, an assessment of current risk must be undertaken to establish the nature and level of risk currently and in any particular situation.

4. Risk Assessment

The risk assessment and management of alleged/suspected offenders will usually be through multi agency risk assessment and procedures e.g. Child Protection Conferences, Multi-agency Public Protection Arrangements (MAPPA) and Multi-agency Risk Assessment Conference (MARAC). Risk assessments should involve discussion and liaison with relevant agencies, such as the local authority, health, Police, probation and education providers where appropriate, so that all relevant information can be shared to enable informed decision making.

Where possible, the individual should be consulted to provide information to assist the risk assessment, unless that would increase risk to a child.

The individual should be given the opportunity to challenge the information on which the decision to disclose is being made, and the response considered as part of the risk assessment.

The risk assessment must consider both enduring and changeable factors and take account of:

  • Nature and pattern of previous offending or harmful behaviour where no conviction has occurred;
  • Compliance with previous sentences or court orders;
  • Proximity of potential victims;
  • Probability that a further offence will be committed;
  • The harm such behaviour will cause;
  • Any behaviour indicating likelihood that they will re-offend;
  • Any expert opinion, for example psychiatric;
  • Any other relevant information for example specific vulnerability of a child.

Use of the term 'Risk to Children'

The term 'Risk to Children' supersedes previous terminology of "Schedule One offender" which was used for anyone convicted of an offence against a child listed in Schedule One of the Children and Young Person's Act 1933. Individuals are now referred to as having "Risk to Children" status to clearly indicate that the person has been identified as presenting a risk or potential risk of harm to children.

Practitioners working in this area should use the list of offences as a 'trigger' to a further assessment to determine if an offender should be regarded as presenting a continued risk of harm to children.

Once an individual has been sentenced and identified as presenting a risk to children, agencies have a responsibility to work collaboratively to monitor and manage the risk of harm to others. Where the offender is given a community sentence, or is being released on Licence, Offender Managers from Probation (or Youth Offending Service workers) will monitor the individual's risk to others and behaviour and liaise with partner agencies through a multi-agency meeting e.g. MAPPA as appropriate.

In cases where the offender has been sentenced to a period of custody, prison establishments will notify Social Care, Police, Probation Providers and other agencies if necessary prior to any period of release.

5. Referral to Children's Social Care

See also Making a Referral to Social Care Procedure.

All practitioners who are concerned that a person may pose a risk to children should make a referral to Children's Social Care. An s47 enquiry must be instigated if the person is living in a household with children, has contact with children or poses an ongoing risk to other children.

All assessments of risk must consider the:

  • The needs and impact upon the individual child;
  • Degree and pattern of abusing or offending behaviour, including behaviour thought to have occurred, but which has not led to a criminal conviction;
  • Level of protection which is likely to be provided by other significant adults.

Where a concern is raised about an individual who is subject of MAPPA, liaison will be needed (see Section 9, Multi Agency Public Protection Arrangements).

Child Protection Conference must be convened if any child is at continuing likelihood of suffering Significant Harm.

6. An Individual who Admits Past Abuse of a Child

In the course of ongoing professional support (such as counselling) a person may disclose that they have abused a child. Whilst recognising the importance of confidential services, the practitioner should ascertain whether the person is living in a household with children, has contact with children or poses an ongoing risk to other children.

The practitioner should seek advice from the designated person for child protection if there is anxiety about the welfare of any child.

The practitioner and agency must make a referral to Children's Social Care and/or the Police (see Adults who Disclose Non Recent Abuse Procedure).

7. A Child who Presents a Risk of Harm to Others

See also Children who Present a Risk of Harm to Others Procedure.

The principles set out in this section are applicable to a child (person under 18 years) who may be identified as a risk to other children. This is applicable whether the children are living in the same household or having contact in specific circumstances such as School or College and includes domestic abuse.

8. Disclosure of Information

8.1 Disclosure by the Local Authority

This procedure applies when the disclosure of information about an individual's previous history is being considered.

Subject to legislation including Domestic Violence Disclosure Scheme and Child Sex Offender Disclosure Scheme, and to the conditions set out in:

The general presumption is that information should not normally be disclosed, except if one of the following applies:

  • Consent from the individual/suspected offender/alleged offender/convicted offender;
  • Statutory requirements or other legal duty;
  • Duty to ensure public safety (which includes the safety of children).

N.B. Legal advice should be sought where doubt exists as to the lawfulness of disclosure and advice should be considered in the absence of consent.

Generally the risk assessment for disclosure of information on convicted abusers will be led by the Police and Probation Service (see Section 9, Multi Agency Public Protection Arrangements (MAPPA)), but Children's Social Care may need to consider the risk also of those alleged abusers who:

  • Have been charged with an offence and outcome of case is pending;
  • Were not prosecuted because the required standard of proof was not met and a criminal case was not pursued;
  • Were not prosecuted but the case 'left on file';
  • Were acquitted.
In view of the possibility of legal challenge by the individual concerned or a future victim, all agencies must, in addition to seeking any legal advice required maintain a written record of events, actions, discussions, decisions and the reasons for them.

8.2 Disclosure Process

Prior to any decision to disclose information, a risk assessment must be undertaken, in order to establish what risks the person poses to children and the risks associated with disclosure. The Police are the only agency authorised to release information about a registered sex offender and must be consulted by any agency wishing to disclose such information to a third party.

Each decision to disclose must be justified on the likelihood of significant harm which non-disclosure might cause and the pressing need for such a disclosure, together with the strength and validity of the evidence relating to the offender/alleged offender.

Consideration must be given to other, less intrusive methods that might achieve any required objectives:

  • If the offender is supervised by Probation, the use of its powers may assist or obviate the need for disclosure;
  • Consent to disclosure should be sought from the individual in question (unless this increases the risk to any child);
  • Consideration should be given to allowing the individual to make the disclosure themselves, which may be sufficient to achieve the objective.

Where a decision to disclose is made, consideration should be given to:

  • The specific content of the information to be disclosed;
  • To whom the information be disclosed and how it will be done;
  • Time scales.

Following disclosure, the practitioner must note:

  • How seriously the child/carer took the information;
  • The carer's ability and plans to protect the child;
  • The carer's immediate plans for protection.

Legal advice should be sought regarding the possibility of disclosure where necessary and the decision taken in consultation with Social Care, Police and Probation at a Strategy Meeting. If the Police do not support any planned disclosure based on the potential risk to an identified child, further legal advice must be taken.

8.3 Disclosure Requests to the Police

The Police are committed to sharing information and intelligence with other agencies for the purposes of protecting children. All requests for information should be made in accordance with the 2013 Protocol and Good Practice Model Disclosure of Information in Cases of Alleged Child Abuse and Linked Criminal and Care Directions Hearings.

Under the Domestic Violence Disclosure Scheme 2014, members of the public have a "right to ask" if a partner of family member has a history of violence or abuse; where agencies hold such information they must consider whether the person applying or any other individual has a "right to know". (For Further Information see Domestic Abuse Procedure, Assessment of Child's Needs).

9. Multi Agency Public Protection Arrangements (MAPPA)

Click here to see MAPPA Guidance 2012 (updated 2017) (MoJ).

Multi Agency Public Protection Arrangements provide a national framework in England and Wales for the assessment and management of risk posed by serious and violent offenders. This includes individuals who are considered to pose a risk or potential risk of harm to children.

The arrangements impose statutory requirements on the Police, Probation Services and the Prison Service (the "Responsible Authorities").

A duty to co-operate with the Responsible Authority has been placed on a number of agencies providing services to offenders including health, housing, Children's Social Care, education, youth offending teams, jobcentre plus, and electronic monitoring providers. Two lay advisers assist the Responsible Authority to monitor and review the MAPP arrangements locally.

While MAPPA will not address the concerns of further serious harm posed by all perpetrators of child abuse, its purpose is to focus on convicted sexual and violent offenders returning to and in the community.

Practitioners, through rigorous risk assessment on an individual case basis, refer offenders to enhanced levels of MAPPA management. Information about the referral process can be obtained from the MAPPA Coordination Unit/Public Protection Unit.

9.1 Identification of MAPPA offenders

Offenders falling within the remit of MAPPA in each area are categorised as follows:

Category 1 - Registered sexual offender as specified under Part 2 of the Sexual Offences Act 2003.

Category 2 - Violent offenders and other sexual offenders:

  1. An offender convicted (or found not guilty by reason of insanity or to be unfit to stand trial and to have done the act charged) of murder or an offence specified under Schedule 15 of the Criminal Justice Act 2003 (CJA 2003) who received a sentence of 12 months or more or a hospital order;
  2. An offender barred from working with children under the DBS Vetting and Barring Scheme.

Category 3 - Other dangerous offender: a person who has been cautioned for or convicted of an offence which indicates that he or she is capable of causing serious harm and which requires multi-agency management. This might not be for an offence under Sch.15 of the CJA 2003.

N.B. The full list of Schedule 15 offences is available at Appendix A: Major Offences to Identify those who Present a Risk, or Potential Risk to Children.

9.2 Sharing of Relevant Information

Exchange of information is essential for effective public protection. Multi-agency Public Protection Panels (MAPPP) can recommend that agencies disclose information about offenders to a number of organisations including schools and voluntary groups.

9.3 Assessment of the Risk of Serious Harm

HM Prison and Probation Service assess risk of harm using the Offender Assessment System (OASYS). The Youth Justice Board use AssetPlus for young people who offend managed by the Youth Offending Service. The following describe each level of risk:

  • Low: no significant, current indicators of risk of harm;
  • Medium: there are identifiable indicators of risk of harm. The offender has the potential to cause harm but is unlikely to do so unless there is a change in circumstances, e.g. failure to take medication, loss of accommodation, relationship breakdown, drug or alcohol misuse;
  • High: there are identifiable indicators of risk of serious harm. The potential event could happen at any time and the impact would be serious;
  • Very high: there is an imminent risk of harm. The potential event is more likely than not to happen imminently and the impact would be serious.
Risk is categorised by reference to who may be the subject of that harm. This includes children who may be vulnerable to harm of various kinds, including violent or sexual behaviour, emotional harm or neglect.

9.4 Managing Risk

The MAPPA framework identifies three separate, but, connected levels, at which risk is managed:

  • Level 1: ordinary agency management;
  • Level 2: active multi-agency management; and
  • Level 3: active enhanced multi-agency management.
Level 1 cases

Ordinary agency management level 1 is where the risks posed by the offender can be managed by the agency responsible for the supervision or case management of the offender. This does not mean that other agencies will not be involved, only that it is not considered necessary to refer the case to a level 2 or 3 MAPPA meeting. It is essential that information sharing takes place, disclosure is considered, and there are discussions between agencies as necessary.

Level 2 cases

Cases should be managed at level 2 where the offender:

  • Is assessed as posing a high or very high risk of serious harm; or
  • The risk level is lower but the case requires the active involvement and co-ordination of interventions from other agencies to manage the presenting risks of serious harm; or
  • The case has been previously managed at level 3 but no longer meets the criteria for level 3; or
  • Multi-agency management adds value to the lead agency's management of the risk of serious harm posed.
Level 3 cases

Level 3 management should be used for cases that meet the criteria for level 2 but where it is determined that the management issues require senior representation from the Responsible Authority and Duty-to-Cooperate agencies. This may be when there is a perceived need to commit significant resources at short notice or where, although not assessed as high or very high risk of serious harm, there is a high likelihood of media scrutiny or public interest in the management of the case and there is a need to ensure that public confidence in the criminal justice system is maintained.

Termination of MAPPA offender status

The period an offender remains a MAPPA offender varies significantly. Some will be MAPPA offenders for life and some for less than 6 months. The period will be dependent upon the offence committed and the sentence imposed.

Offenders will cease to be MAPPA offenders in the following circumstances:

  • Category 1 offenders – Registered Sex Offenders - when their period of registration expires. In the most serious cases, registration is for life (those subject to life registration will soon be able to apply for a review of their registration requirement);
  • Category 2 offenders - violent and other sexual offenders - when the licence expires, the offender is discharged from the hospital order or guardianship order;
  • Category 3 offenders - other dangerous offenders - when a level 2 or 3 MAPPA meeting decides that the risk of harm has reduced sufficiently or the case no longer requires active multi-agency management.

All Category 1 and 2 offenders managed at MAPPA levels 2 or 3 who are coming to the end of their notification requirements or period of statutory supervision must be reviewed and should be considered for registration as a Category 3 offender. However, registration as a Category 3 offender should only occur if they meet the criteria and continue to require active multi-agency management.

All except Category 2 level 1 offenders will have an active Violent and Sex Offender Register (ViSOR) database record; Note at the end of 2018 Category 2, level 1 cases will also be included on ViSOR. When they cease to be MAPPA offenders, the record will be archived. The record will remain in ViSOR until the offender's 100th birthday. At this point, the case will be reviewed with the expectation that the record will be deleted.

A Potentially Dangerous Person (PDP) is a person who is not currently managed under one of the three MAPPA categories, but whose behaviour gives reasonable grounds for believing that there is a present likelihood of them committing an offence or offences that will cause serious harm.

Examples of PDPs include:

  • A person charged with domestic abuse offences on a number of occasions against different partners but never convicted of offences that would make them a MAPPA-eligible offender;
  • An individual who is continually investigated for allegations of child sexual abuse but is never charged or never receives a civil order, but whom agencies still believe poses a serious risk of sexual harm to children;
  • A terrorist suspected but not convicted of an offence;
  • Where a Community Psychiatric Nurse (CPN) shares information with the police that a patient with mental ill health has disclosed fantasies about committing serious violent offences. The patient is not cooperating with the current treatment plan, and the CPN believes serious violent behaviour is imminent;
  • A person who has committed offences abroad that had they been committed here would result in the offender being managed under MAPPA.
These types of individuals could still benefit from active risk management but would not be managed under MAPPA. This management would usually involve two or more agencies, although there may be cases where only the police are involved. There must be a present likelihood of the subject causing serious harm in order for their case to be managed.

10. Multi-Agency Risk Assessment Conferences (MARAC)

See also Domestic Abuse Procedure.

Where an individual has been the victim of domestic abuse, including where they or the perpetrator has children, a Safelives DASH risk assessment should be completed in relation to the victim and the Domestic Violence Risk Identification Matrix (DVRIM) (see Documents Library, Assessment Tools) used to assess the level of risk to any children. MARACs will be held where risks above a certain threshold are identified and a risk reduction strategy put in place around the perpetrator as well as the victim and any children. A failure to implement the agreed strategy or any repeat of violence or abuse should be brought back to a MARAC for further consideration.

11. Safe Employment and Recruitment

11.1 Allegations Against Staff, Carers and Volunteers

Any information or allegation that a person in a "position of trust" in relation to a child, has acted to harm a child or place any child at risk of harm must be investigated and referred to the Local Authority Designated Officer (LADO). Any investigation by Social Care or Police should consider the employment situation of any suspected perpetrator of abuse, and refer to the LADO if appropriate.

See also Allegations Against Staff, Carers and Volunteers Procedure.

11.2 Disqualification from Working with Children

People can be disqualified from working with children. A person is disqualified by either:

A Disqualification Order is made by the Crown Court when a person is convicted for a specified offence against a child (including sexual offences, violent offences and offences of selling Class A drugs to a child) and is of indefinite duration (i.e. for life) but application can be made for an order to be reviewed by the Care Standards Tribunal after 10 years (or 5 years in the case of a juvenile).

Disqualification Orders are made as part of the sentence and, therefore, cannot be made on application. People who are disqualified from working with children are prohibited from applying for, offering to do, accepting, or doing, any work in a Regulated Activity.

The Department for Education have published updated guidance on what constitutes regulated activity, see Statutory Guidance: Regulated Activity (children) - Supervision of Activity with Children which is Regulated when Unsupervised.

A person who is disqualified commits an offence if he/she knowingly applies for, offers to do, accepts, or does, any work with children. It is also an offence for an individual knowingly to offer work with children to, or procure work with children for, an individual who is disqualified from working with children, or to allow such an individual to continue in such work. The Police should be contacted if such an offence is committed.

Education services, schools, FE institutions and other employers have a statutory duty to inform the DBS if they cease to use a person's services on grounds of misconduct or unsuitability to work with children, or someone leaves in circumstances where the employer might have ceased to use their services on one of those grounds. The Police should also inform the DBS if a teacher or other member of staff at a school is convicted of a criminal offence.

Employers should also make a referral to any relevant professional bodies such as the General Medical Council, Nursing and Midwifery Council, Health and Care Professionals Council, General Teaching Council or the Independent Office for Police Conduct.

Also see Keeping Children Safe in Education (GOV.UK).

11.3 Criminal Records Disclosures

The DBS service aims to help employers make safer recruitment decisions by identifying candidates who may be unsuitable for certain types of work.

Employers should ask successful candidates to apply to the DBS for a Standard or Enhanced Disclosure, depending on the duties of the particular position or job involved. In addition to information about a person's criminal record, Disclosures supplied in connection with work with children will contain details of whether a person is included on the DBS's Barred List. Enhanced Disclosures may contain details of acquittals or other non-conviction information held on local Police records, relevant to the position or post for which the person has been selected.

12. Other Processes and Mechanisms

12.1 Records

All agencies should ensure that their recording systems allow the easy identification of individuals who present a risk of harm to children. Where those individuals are, or later become, linked to children, consideration must be given to any new or current risks and the need for an up-dated risk assessment.

12.2 The Sex Offender Register

The notification requirements of Part 2 of the Sexual Offences Act 2003 (known as the Sex Offenders Register) are an automatic requirement on offenders who receive a conviction or caution for certain sexual offences. The notification requirements are intended to ensure that the Police can manage the risk of offenders in the community. The notification requirements do not bar offenders from certain types of employment, from being alone with children etc.

Failure to comply with these requirements is a criminal offence. The Police should be contacted if such an offence is committed.

12.3 Notification Orders

Notification Orders are intended to ensure that British citizens or residents, as well as foreign nationals, can be made subject to the notification requirements (the Sex Offenders Register) in the UK if they receive convictions or cautions for sexual offences overseas.

Notification Orders are made on application from the Police to a Magistrates' Court. Therefore, if an offender is identified who has received a conviction or caution for a sexual offence overseas the case should be referred to the local Police for action.

Any information that an individual has received a conviction or caution for a sexual offence overseas should be shared with the Police.

12.4 Sexual Harm Prevention Orders (Anti-Social Behaviour, Crime and Policing Act 2014)

Sexual Harm Prevention Orders can be applied to anyone convicted or cautioned of a sexual or violent offence, including where offences are committed overseas.

The court needs to be satisfied that the order is necessary for protecting the public, or any particular members of the public, from sexual harm, or protecting children from sexual harm from the defendant outside the United Kingdom.

The Orders prohibit the defendant from doing anything described in the order, and can include a prohibition on foreign travel (replacing Foreign Travel Orders which were introduced by the Sexual Offences Act 2003).

A prohibition contained in a Sexual Harm Prevention Order has effect for a fixed period, specified in the order, of at least 5 years, or until further order. The Order may specify different periods for different prohibitions.

Failure to comply with a requirement imposed under an Order is an offence punishable by a fine and/or imprisonment.

12.5 Sexual Risk Orders (Anti Social Behaviour, Crime and Policing Act 2014)

Sexual Risk Orders (SRO) can be made where a person has done an act of a sexual nature as a result of which there is reasonable cause to believe that it is necessary for such an order to be made, even if they have never been convicted. They replace the previous Risk of Sexual Harm Orders (RoSHO).

A SRO can made by the magistrates' court on application by the police or National Crime Agency (NCA). The court needs to be satisfied that the order is necessary for protecting the public or any particular members of the public, from sexual harm from the defendant; or protecting children or vulnerable adults generally, or any particular children or vulnerable adults, from sexual harm from the defendant outside the United Kingdom.

The Orders prohibit the defendant from doing anything described in the order, and can include a prohibition on foreign travel (replacing Foreign Travel Orders which were introduced by the Sexual Offences Act 2003).

A prohibition contained in a Sexual Risk Order has effect for a fixed period, specified in the order, of not less than 2 years, or until further order. The Order may specify different periods for different prohibitions.

Failure to comply with a requirement imposed under an Order is an offence punishable by a fine and/or imprisonment.

Existing RoSHOs will still stand.

12.6 Violent Offender Orders (VOO)

VOOs are a targeted risk management tool which can impose prohibitions, restrictions or conditions on offenders convicted of a specified violent offence who pose a risk of violent harm to the public in the UK. The offender must be 18 years or above and have received a custodial sentence of 12 months or more. Breach of any of the prohibitions in a VOO is a criminal offence. The Police should be contacted whenever a VOO is breached.

12.7 Domestic Violence Notification Orders (DVNO) and Protection Orders (DVPO)

See also Section 8.3, Police Disclosure Requests and Domestic Abuse Procedure.

Under the Domestic Violence Disclosure Scheme 2014, the Police may issue a DVNO which will contain provision to prohibit a perpetrator of domestic abuse from molesting a named individual and will also address the welfare of any relevant children. The Police may then apply for a DVPO which will extend this protection for an identified period. Breach of any of the prohibitions in a DVPO carries a power of arrest and detention by the Police to bring the perpetrator back before the Court. The Police should be contacted whenever a DVPO is breached.

12.8 Probation Licence Conditions

When an offender is released on licence, pending completion of sentence, Probation can impose conditions on where the offender may live and other restrictions. If the offender breaches any of these conditions they may be recalled to prison for the remainder of the sentence or pending appeal or further parole. Probation should be notified whenever licence conditions are breached.

12.9 Bail Conditions

The ability of the police to bail people under investigation changed in April 2017. This was a reaction to various high profile cases in which people were bailed for very lengthy periods of time, often with conditions of bail in place that placed significant restrictions on them. This was a particular issue where the person was then released without charge.

As a result of this the government altered the Bail Act (Overview of the Policing & Crime Bill) so that there is a presumption of release without bail in all cases. It is no longer possible to bail someone without conditions, and the argument to bail with conditions must be strong and authorised at a higher level than previously. Bail can only be imposed for a maximum of 28 days initially. This can be extended to 3 months by a senior officer if appropriate and not beyond that without applying to court.

The practicality of this is that bail is becoming increasingly rare. Generally speaking suspects will be released from custody without bail, which means that they have no conditions to adhere to and no obligation to return to the police station. However, it should be noted that there are offences that can be committed by a suspect released under investigation that would leave them liable to arrest, such as intimidating a witness.

Where a person is suspected of offending against a child there may be a stronger case for bail, but this must still be assessed as above and bail may not be granted. If it is deemed appropriate in the circumstances, a proactive disclosure can still be made to any organisations that the suspect is associated with if there is a likelihood that they will come into unsupervised access to children and there is a risk of offences being committed.

Appendix A: Appendix A: Major Offences to Identify those who Present a Risk, or Potential Risk to Children

Click here to view Appendix A: Major Offences to Identify those who Present a Risk, or Potential Risk to Children.